Reviewed by people with no reason to be kind.
Recognition matters only when it comes from somewhere with a reputation to lose. Listed here are the programme selections, independent assessments and audited reviews of the detection logic, including what each one actually examined.
What was examined, and by whom.
Each entry states what the assessor actually looked at, which is the only part that matters.
Detection logic assessment
An external assessor examined the scoring model and the false-positive methodology, not the marketing claims.
Regional cyber innovation cohort
Selected on technical merit following a review of the baselining approach.
University research collaboration
Method reviewed and published on, including the failure conditions we disclosed.
Enterprise security assessment
Passed a customer-led audit of collection practices, data handling and retention.
Watch-floor process review
Escalation policy, shift handover and evidence retention examined against stated SLAs.
Four things absent from this page.
Their absence is deliberate. Recognition that means nothing is worse than none.
No paid awards
Nothing on this page was bought, entered for a fee, or sponsored.
No self-assessed scores
Every figure here was produced by someone other than us.
No quadrant placements
We are not large enough to be in one, and pretending otherwise would be silly.
No customer counts as proof
Forty networks is a fact, not an endorsement. The audits are the endorsement.
The numbers an assessor checked.
These are the specific claims that were examined rather than asserted.
Read what they actually said.
Full assessment documents, including the findings that were critical, are available on request.